Crises Managed
Across 38 industries, 6 continents.
Narrative Reversal Rate
Measured at 90-day public perception audit.
Avg. First-Response Time
From initial contact to strategic statement draft.
Your reputation has a half-life. We extend it.
Discipline I
Crisis Containment
Marcus Reid
Senior Crisis Strategist · 22 Years
A product recall. A whistleblower. A front-page investigation. The threat vectors change; the underlying dynamics don't. Every crisis is an information asymmetry problem — and the side that controls the information flow controls the outcome.
What separates a managed crisis from a career-ending one?
Preparation and the first 90 minutes. Most organizations wait for legal clearance before they say anything. Their silence reads as guilt. We draft the statement before the story is published — because we're already in the room when the reporter files their first inquiry.
When should a company engage Shield — after the story breaks, or before?
Before. Always before. We build the architecture — the relationships, the pre-approved language, the stakeholder maps — so that when the moment arrives, we're not starting from zero. We're executing a plan that's already been stress-tested.
"The organization that speaks first, speaks with authority. The organization that speaks second is already explaining itself."
Case File
Consumer Packaged Goods
████████ ████ Corp.
Threat Vector
Product contamination allegation — national distribution hold threatened within 8 hours of initial social amplification.
Engagement Timeline
72 hours
Outcome
100% shelf retention. Media narrative shifted from "safety failure" to "industry-leading response protocol" within 6 days.
-84%
Reduction in negative media mentions at day 14
Average time to first strategic statement — before most legal teams have finished their first call.
Discipline II
Media Architecture
Catherine Ellsworth
Director, Media Relations · Former Bureau Chief
Seventeen years placing and killing stories at the intersection of business, law, and politics. The calls I take now are from editors I've known since they were stringers.
Active Press Relationships
+140 national and regional relationships cultivated over 17 years.
How do you build media relationships that hold when a story breaks against you?
You build them before you need them. A journalist who has taken your call for three years — who knows you don't waste their time — will give you the courtesy of a question before they publish. That courtesy is worth more than any press release ever written.
What does "narrative architecture" actually mean in practice?
It means deciding, before the first interview, what the story is — and making every subsequent piece of communication reinforce that story. Not spin. Not deflection. A coherent, defensible account that gives reporters and analysts something to write toward rather than against.
How do you handle a hostile journalist with an agenda?
You don't fight them. You make their story less interesting than the alternative story. We give them access, data, and context that makes a fair account more compelling than an adversarial one. Most journalists prefer a good story to a hit piece.
"A story placed correctly in the right outlet at the right moment is worth ten crisis statements issued after the fact."
Situation Room Access
"The call you make in the first hour determines whether you're managing a story or surviving one."
Request a Confidential BriefingDiscipline III
Regulatory Narrative
Nathaniel Voss
Regulatory Affairs Lead · Former DOJ Communications
Regulatory scrutiny is not a communications problem. It is a trust problem — between the organization and its regulators, its investors, and its employees. Communications is how you rebuild that trust in parallel with the legal process, not after it concludes.
How does narrative strategy interact with ongoing litigation or regulatory proceedings?
Very carefully. We work in close coordination with outside counsel — often inside the same document hold environment. The goal is never to contradict legal posture. It's to ensure that the public-facing narrative doesn't inadvertently harden positions or create discovery problems. We've worked alongside counsel at Skadden, Sullivan & Cromwell, and Weil on matters where the regulatory and reputational timelines were running simultaneously.
What does a congressional inquiry look like from a communications standpoint?
It's a three-front war: the hearing room, the press gallery, and the constituent inbox. Most organizations focus on testimony prep and ignore the other two. We prepare spokespeople for the twenty-second clip that will run on cable — not the three-hour transcript that won't.
"The regulator reads the same newspaper your board does. Narrative coherence between those two audiences is not optional — it is the entire game."
Case File
Financial Services
████████ ████ Holdings
Threat Vector
SEC inquiry disclosed in an 8-K filing. Short-seller report published 48 hours later citing internal communications obtained through a former employee.
Engagement Timeline
18 months of engagement
Outcome
SEC inquiry closed without enforcement action. Short-seller report retracted. Stock recovered 91% of pre-disclosure value within 11 months.
$2.3B
Market cap preserved through narrative stabilization program
Of clients who engaged Shield within 72 hours of a public crisis achieved measurable narrative reversal within 30 days.
Discipline IV
Digital Sentiment Control
Priya Sundaram
Digital Intelligence Lead · Former Platform Policy
The digital environment doesn't create crises. It accelerates them. The same dynamics that make a story go viral in four hours are the dynamics we use to turn it around in seventy-two.
How do you manage a crisis that originates on social media and moves faster than any statement can?
You don't chase the feed. You anchor the story at a point upstream — a credible outlet, a verified spokesperson, a documented fact — and let the feed come to you. Every attempt to fight social media on its own terms accelerates the very velocity you're trying to slow.
What is "digital sentiment control" in practice?
It's the systematic identification of the 40 to 60 voices whose amplification actually drives the narrative — the analysts, the substackers, the beat reporters with 80,000 followers — and the targeted, direct engagement with each of them before the crisis becomes the story. Broadcast is for announcements. This work is one-to-one.
Can you suppress a story once it's already viral?
Suppression is the wrong frame. You can't erase. You can reframe, redirect, and outpace. The goal is to ensure that the tenth search result and the thirtieth tweet are as favorable as the first ones were unfavorable. Over time, the aggregate picture corrects. It takes months, not hours — and it starts with the decision you make in the first 24.
"The organizations that recover fastest are not the ones with the best statements. They're the ones with the most credible voices already on record."
Performance Benchmarks
73 days
Avg. Sentiment Recovery
-61%
Hostile Coverage Reduction
88%
Stakeholder Confidence Retention
Retainer Structure
Shield engages on retained and project bases. All engagements begin with a confidential intake call — no public RFP process, no conflicts disclosure to third parties.
Situation Room Access
Request a Confidential Briefing
All inquiries are handled with attorney-client-level discretion. Initial calls are conducted under NDA. Shield does not disclose client relationships.
Restricted Document
The First 48 Hours Protocol
Shield's internal playbook for the first 48 hours of a public crisis — including the exact sequence of stakeholder notifications, media holding statements, and board communication templates used across 400+ active crises.
What to expect
Encrypted intake call within 4 business hours.
Mutual NDA executed before any substantive discussion.
Preliminary assessment delivered within 24 hours of first call.
Engagement proposal — scope, team, timeline — within 48 hours.
Shield Advisory Group — Confidential engagements available.